Contests the vitalistic view of Bergson's élan vital and explores its thermodynamic implications in evolution.
The received view of B ergson's philosophy of life is that it advances some form of vitalism under the heading of an “ élan vital .” This paper argues against the vitalistic interpretation of B ergson's élan vital as it appears in C reative E volution (1907) in favor of an interpretation based on his overlooked reflections on entropy and energetics. Within the interpretation developed here, the élan vital is characterized not as a spiritualistic “vital force” but as a tendency of organization opposed to the tendency of entropic degradation. It is then shown how B ergson's view of evolution and living organization resonates with more contemporary scientific approaches belonging to a “thermodynamic paradigm” in theoretical biology in different respects, including the critique of neo‐ D arwinism and the positing of a driving force behind evolution. Finally, the special interest that B ergson's philosophical biology bears today is considered in terms of the connection between the concepts of élan vital and duration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James DiFrisco (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: