Key result
Molecular and metabolic biomarkers identify recurrence risk and provide therapeutic targets in soft tissue sarcoma.
Why the study?
Soft tissue sarcoma mortality remains high despite adjuvant chemotherapy, creating a need for new prognostic stratification markers to identify patients at risk of recurrence and guide intensive or novel treatments.
This review highlights recent advancements in molecular characterization and biomarker research for soft tissue sarcomas, which may help identify novel therapeutic targets and prognostic markers.
Hypothesis-generating for biomarker-guided care in soft tissue sarcoma; prospective validation needed before clinical adoption.
Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of rare tumors. Although constituting only 1% of all human malignancies, STSs represent the second most common type of solid tumors in children and adolescents and comprise an important group of secondary malignancies. Over 100 histologic subtypes have been characterized to date (occurring predominantly in the trunk, extremity, and retroperitoneum), and many more are being discovered due to molecular profiling. STS mortality remains high, despite adjuvant chemotherapy. New prognostic stratification markers are needed to help identify patients at risk of recurrence and possibly apply more intensive or novel treatments. Recent scientific advancements have enabled a more precise molecular characterization of sarcoma subtypes and revealed novel therapeutic targets and prognostic/predictive biomarkers. This review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the most relevant cellular, molecular and metabolic biomarkers for STS, and highlight advances in STS-related biomarker research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pillozzi et al. (2021) conducted a review in Soft tissue sarcomas. Biomarkers was evaluated. Cellular, molecular, and metabolic biomarkers provide novel therapeutic targets and prognostic stratification to help identify soft tissue sarcoma patients at risk of recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: