Arguments for the efficiency of federalism typically depend on a decentralization thesis and a competition thesis, both of which relate to mobility. In this essay I shall review and appraise these two lines of argument I shall suggest that the decentralization thesis is best seen, not as an argument for the efficiency of federalism, but as an efficiency criterion against which models of federalism may be evaluated By contrast, competition and mobility are aspects of the procedural mechanism of federalism which must be supplemented by explicit models of the political process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Hamlin (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: