PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2005Clinical Psychology Science and Practice592 citations

Treatment integrity and therapeutic change: Issues and research recommendations.

View Full Paper
FPFrancheska PerepletchikovaCornell University
Alan E. Kazdin
Alan E. KazdinRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of treatment outcome research is establishing treatment integrity. Integrity of the treatment refers to the degree to which treatment is implemented as intended. Research examining the relationship between treatment integrity and therapeutic change has produced conflicting results. However, assessment, design strategies, and the possible confound of integrity with other variables may explain the inconsistency in findings. This paper elaborates the limitations of existing strategies for evaluating the relationship between treatment integrity and outcome. Recommendations for future research include controlling possible confounding variables, experimentally manipulating treatment integrity, and using novel assessment and evaluation strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Perepletchikova et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16f64283b2be9fec6b9ce2https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpi045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper