Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: they are provided and (ii) identify whether any clinical and/or functional improvements were detectable among service users after six CMHT visits (intake + five follow-up visits) and, if so, identify principal predictors of such improvements. Methods: 947 CMHT service users enrolled between April-December 2021 were assessed on clinical outcomes using the Clinical Global Improvement scale (CGI) and functional outcomes using WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2·0). Chi-square and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to assess changes in CGI and WHODAS scores, respectively, at the fifth (or fourth) follow-up CMHT visit. Hierarchical multinomial logistic regression and hierarchical multiple linear regression identified predictors of clinical and functional improvement, respectively. Findings: < 0·001) and most service users' illness severity stabilised (n = 451/742, 60·8%) or improved (n = 243/742, 32·6%). Clinical stabilisation (compared to worsening) was predicted by being male and living <20 km from the CMHT office, while improvement was predicted by frequent receipt of pharmacological support and receiving CMHT care in non-conflict-exposed regions. Functional improvement was predicted by living between 20 and 100 km from the CMHT office, having a somatic comorbidity, more frequent receipt of psychosocial services for the service user's family, and more support for community integration. Interpretation: We found positive results associated with enrolment in Ukraine's CMHTs. Recommendations for future research and improvements to the CMHT programming are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ladyk-Bryzghalova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: