Key result
Discontinuing GLP-1RA therapy is linked to ~68% higher risk of major events or death.
Why the study?
GLP-1RA discontinuation is associated with deterioration of cardiovascular risk factors, but whether interrupting therapy increases the risk of cardiovascular events or mortality compared with continued use was unclear.
Does discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists increase the risk of a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause compared with persistent use in people with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=80,302)
Yes
Does discontinuation of GLP-1 receptor agonists increase the risk of a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause compared with persistent use in people with type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease?
In patients with type 2 diabetes without prior cardiovascular disease, discontinuing GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy is associated with a 68% higher hazard of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality compared to continuous treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observed higher event rates should not yet change practice; leaves open causal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonist discontinuation.
Background: Discontinuation of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RA) has been associated with the deterioration of multiple cardiovascular risk factors, especially body weight regain. However, whether the interruption of such medication, compared with their continued use, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality is unclear. Methods: Leveraging data collected between 2004 and 2024 from 301 diabetes clinics in Italy, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in which people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), without cardiovascular diseases, and initiating a GLP-1RA were categorized as persistent users or as discontinuation group. The primary end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause among patients discontinuing the medication as compared with persistent users, accounting for immortal time bias through the treatment-exposed person-time approach and adjusting the analyses for unbalanced variables. We also examined the associated trends of risk factors levels. Findings: Of the 80,302 subjects initiating a therapy with a GLP-1RA, 31,687 (39.5%) were still on therapy at the last visit, while 48,615 (60.5%) had discontinued treatment. Mean exposure was 2.97 ± 2.93 years among persistent users and 1.21 ± 2.13 years in the discontinuation group. Follow-up was 3.65 ± 3.03 and 4.25 ± 3.41 years, respectively. During this period, 3,240 primary end point events occurred in the persistent users group and 4,038 events in the discontinuation group. The resulting incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49–1.85) while the relative hazard ratio (HR) was 1.68 (95% CI 1.60-1.77). The IRR for death from any cause was 2.82 (95% CI 2.49-3.20) and the corresponding HR 2.94 (95% CI 2.72-3.18). Interpretation: In people with T2D and without previous cardiovascular disease, interrupting a therapy with GLP-1RA had a higher risk of a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause compared to those continuing the treatment. Continuous treatment with these medications may be required to maintain their long-term benefit on cardiovascular diseases and reduced mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceriello et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes without cardiovascular disease (n=80,302). GLP-1 receptor agonist discontinuation vs. Persistent GLP-1 receptor agonist use was evaluated on Composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.60-1.77). Discontinuing GLP-1RA therapy in T2D patients without prior CVD increased the risk of MI, stroke, or all-cause death compared to persistent use (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.60-1.77).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: