Key result
CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score predicts ~37% higher LAAT risk in non-valvular AF or AFL.
Why the study?
To compare different clinical risk scores for assessing the risk of left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombosis in patients with non-valvular AF or AFL undergoing TEE before catheter ablation or cardioversion.
Which risk score is most informative for predicting left atrial thrombosis before catheter ablation or cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter?
Case-Control (n=200)
No
Which risk score is most informative for predicting left atrial thrombosis before catheter ablation or cardioversion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter?
Effect estimate: OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.21-1.55)
p-value: p=0.004
The CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score is the most informative independent predictor of left atrial thrombosis in patients with non-valvular AF or AFL undergoing TEE before catheter ablation or cardioversion.
Hypothesis-generating for CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF in pre-procedural LAAT risk; prospective validation needed before clinical adoption.
Aim . To compare different scores in assessment of risk of left atrial or its appendage thrombosis (LAAT) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography before catheter ablation (CA) or cardioversion (CV). Material and methods . In retrospective, single-center, case-control study medical records of 1994 patients with non-valvular AF or AF from the period 2014-2019, who underwent transesophageal echocardiography before CA or elective CV, were analyzed. LAAT was detected in 33 of them. For the control group, 167 patients without LAAT were randomly selected from this database. CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, R 2 CHADS 2 , R-CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-RAF, mCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-AFR, ATRIA scores were evaluated and compared as potential predictors of LAAT. Results . Mean age of studied patients (n=200) was 60.3±10.9, 55% of them were males. Most of patients had non-valvular AF (87,5%) and were assessed before CA (84,0%). All risk scores were associated with LAAT and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-RAF score was most informative [AUC 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.91]. According to multivariate analysis in a logistic regression model among studied risk scores CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was the single independent predictor of LAAT [odds ratio (OR) 1.37; 95% CI 1.21-1.55; p=0.004). OR of LAAT among patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-RAF >3 was 12.8 (95% CI 3.75-43.9; p<0.0001) with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicting values 90.6%, 57.1%, 30.2% and 96.7% respectively Conclusion. In the studied group of patients with non-valvular AF or AFL, without severe structural heart disease and severe concomitant diseases CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHADS2, R-CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHA2DS2-VASc, CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF, mCHA2DS2-VASc, CHA2DS2-VASc-AFR, ATRIA scores were associated with LAAT. CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was the most informative. >˂0.0001) with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicting values 90.6%, 57.1%, 30.2% and 96.7% respectively. Conclusion . In the studied group of patients with non-valvular AF or AFL, without severe structural heart disease and severe concomitant diseases CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, R 2 CHADS 2 , R-CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, R 2 CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-RAF, mCHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-AFR, ATRIA scores were associated with LAAT. CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc-RAF score was the most informative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Заиграев et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in non-valvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (n=200). CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score vs. Other risk scores (CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, etc.) was evaluated on Left atrial or its appendage thrombosis (LAAT) (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.21-1.55, p=0.004). The CHA2DS2-VASc-RAF score was the most informative independent predictor of left atrial or appendage thrombosis (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.21-1.55; p=0.004) among patients with non-valvular AF or AFL.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: