Why the study?
Predicting thromboembolic events caused by left atrial appendage thrombosis is crucial in nonvalvular AF, prompting evaluation of the predictive effectiveness of the novel CLOTS-AF score compared with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Does the CLOTS-AF score better predict left atrial appendage thrombosis compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing TEE?
Does the CLOTS-AF score better predict left atrial appendage thrombosis compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing TEE?
The CLOTS-AF score outperforms the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting left atrial appendage thrombosis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CLOTS-AF may aid LAAT prediction on TEE in NVAF; leaves open superiority to CHA2DS2-VASc in prospective cohorts.
Background Predicting thromboembolic events caused by left atrial appendage thrombosis (LAAT) is crucial since it is the most concerning complication of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).Objective The objective of this study was to establish the predictive effectiveness of a novel scoring system known as the CLOTS-AF score in identifying the existence of thrombus using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with NVAF and to compare it with the CHA2DS2-VASc score.Methods This study was conducted retrospectively with 668 NVAF patients who underwent TEE in a single centre. The patients were categorized into two categories based on the presence or absence of LAAT on TEE. The CLOTS-AF score was computed for all patients, which was then compared to the CHA2DS2-VASc score.Results Thrombus was detected in the left atrial appendage (LAA) of 114 (17%) individuals. The study revealed that the thrombus (+) group had substantially higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores and CLOTS-AF scores (3 (2–4); 4 (3–6), p < .001), respectively. Furthermore, the CLOTS-AF score was shown to be a better predictor of LAAT than the CHA2DS2-VASc score (AUC: 0.70 vs. AUC: 0.61, p < .001).Conclusions This study could validate the CLOTS-AF score in an external cohort by demonstrating its significant predictive power and underscoring its vital role in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalenderoğlu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: