Key result
Carvedilol and nebivolol similarly improved left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months in patients with non-ischemic heart failure (36±5% vs 37±5%, inter-group p=0.30).
Why the study?
Does carvedilol compared to nebivolol improve left ventricular systolic functions in symptomatic non-ischemic heart failure patients with EF≤40%?
RCT (n=61)
Randomized
Does carvedilol compared to nebivolol improve left ventricular systolic functions in symptomatic non-ischemic heart failure patients with EF≤40%?
Absolute Event Rate: 36% vs 37%
p-value: p=0.30
Carvedilol and nebivolol provide comparable improvements in left ventricular systolic function and functional capacity in patients with non-ischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Supports either agent based on tolerability in non-ischemic HFrEF; confirms beta-blocker equivalence on LVEF in this etiology.
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether carvedilol and nebivolol produce different effects on short-term left ventricle (LV) systolic function in heart failure (HF). These drugs could improve systolic and diastolic functions of the LV. Thus, we aimed to compare their effects on LV systolic functions in patients with non-ischemic HF. METHODS: This study included 61 symptomatic non-ischemic HF patients with low ejection fraction (EF) (EF≤40%) between September 2008 and November 2010. The patients were randomized to carvedilol (n=31, 16 males) or nebivolol (n=30, 19 male). They were evaluated clinically and echocardiographically at baseline and 3 and 6 months after target dose; 42% of patients in the carvedilol group and 47% in the nebivolol group achieved the target dose before randomization. LV systolic functions were evaluated with ventricle diameters, EF, ejection time (ET), isovolumic contraction time (IVCT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), and myocardial performance index (MPI). RESULTS: At 6 months, carvedilol and nebivolol similarly improved EF (from 33±4% to 36±5%, p<0.01 and from 34±5% to 37±5%, p<0.01, inter-group p=0.30, respectively) and MPI (from 0.71±0.10 to 0.53±0.07, p<0.01 and from 0.69±0.13 to 0.52±0.08, p<0.01, intergroup p=0.45, respectively). LV diameter was reduced by a similar extent in both groups. In each group, IVCT and IVRT were significantly shortened and ET was prolonged, but there was no inter-group difference. Functional capacity improved similarly (from NYHA Class II-III to Class I-0) in both groups, as did heart rate and blood pressure. Reduction of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels was also comparable in both groups (p=0.41). CONCLUSION: Carvedilol and nebivolol can similarly improve LV systolic functions in non-ischemic HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karabacak et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Non-ischemic heart failure (n=61). Carvedilol vs. Nebivolol was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) at 6 months (p=0.30). Carvedilol and nebivolol similarly improved left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months in patients with non-ischemic heart failure (36±5% vs 37±5%, inter-group p=0.30).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: