In the framework of a duplication-based method for comparing gene and species trees, the concepts of "duplication" and "loss" are reformulated in set-theoretic terms. A number of related tree dissimilarity measures is suggested, and relations between them are analyzed. For any node in the species tree, the number of gene duplications for which it is a "non-child" loss coincides with the number of times when the node's parent is an intermediate between the mapping images of a gene node and its parent. This implies that the total number of losses is equal to the number of intermediate nodes plus the number of one-side duplications and, thus, provides an alternative proof for a conjecture made by Mirkin, Muchnik, and Smith (1995). Another formula proven involves crossings (incompatible gene-species node pairs): the number of losses equals the number of crossings plus the number of duplications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eulenstein et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: