Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
QT measurement variability persists; leaves open standardized protocols for consistent clinical and research use.
Journal Article Measurement of the QT Interval Get access R. W. F. Campbell, R. W. F. Campbell Departments of Cardiology and Medical Physics, Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar P. Gardiner, P. Gardiner Departments of Cardiology and Medical Physics, Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar P. A. Amos, P. A. Amos Departments of Cardiology and Medical Physics, Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar D. Chadwick, D. Chadwick Departments of Cardiology and Medical Physics, Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar R. S. Jordan R. S. Jordan Departments of Cardiology and Medical Physics, Freeman HospitalNewcastle upon Tyne, U.K. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar European Heart Journal, Volume 6, Issue suppl_D, November 1985, Pages 81–83, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/6.suppl_D.81 Published: 01 November 1985
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: