Why the study?
Timely reperfusion is critical for favorable acute ischemic stroke outcomes, but delays before and after hospital arrival remain common in India.
Does faster reperfusion (DTN ≤60 min and OTN ≤180 min) improve 90-day functional recovery in adults with acute ischemic stroke?
Population
250 consecutive adults with neuroimaging-confirmed acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy
Comparison
Pre-hospital delay and door-to-needle time intervals
Design
Single-center prospective observational study
Follow-up
90 days
Key result
Door-to-needle time ≤60 minutes independently increased the odds of a good 90-day functional outcome by more than two-fold (AOR 2.21) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Authors
Loading...
Supports DTN ≤60 min targets in thrombolysis; hypothesis-generating, requires RCTs before practice change.
Observational (n=250)
No
Does faster reperfusion (DTN ≤60 min and OTN ≤180 min) improve 90-day functional recovery in adults with acute ischemic stroke?
Effect estimate: AOR 2.21 (95% CI 1.33-3.55)
p-value: p=0.002
Faster reperfusion times (door-to-needle ≤60 min and onset-to-needle ≤180 min) significantly improve the odds of good 90-day functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Jena et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke (n=250). Door-to-needle (DTN) time ≤60 min vs. Door-to-needle (DTN) time >60 min was evaluated on Good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.33-3.55, p=0.002). Door-to-needle time ≤60 minutes independently increased the odds of a good 90-day functional outcome by more than two-fold (AOR 2.21) in patients with acute ischemic stroke.