Key result
The SMART pass algorithm significantly improved S-ICD vector eligibility during exercise compared to when the algorithm was off (97.9% vs 90.6%, P=0.03).
Why the study?
Although the SMART pass algorithm can identify more selectable vectors to reduce T-wave oversensing after S-ICD implantation, this improvement in eligibility had not yet been well validated.
Does the SMART pass algorithm improve S-ICD vector eligibility and reduce T-wave oversensing in patients implanted with an S-ICD?
Observational (n=34)
Yes
Does the SMART pass algorithm improve S-ICD vector eligibility and reduce T-wave oversensing in patients implanted with an S-ICD?
The SMART pass algorithm significantly increases the availability of selectable vectors without T-wave oversensing during exercise in patients with S-ICD, potentially reducing inappropriate shocks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support SMART pass for exercise eligibility; leaves open impact on shocks in prospective studies.
Background Compared to screening ECG before implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ ICD ), selectable vectors without T‐wave oversensing increase after S‐ ICD implantation. Newer algorithms have recently become available to reduce T‐wave oversensing, such as SMART pass ( SP ). With this function, more selectable vectors are identified after S‐ ICD implantation. However, this improvement in eligibility utilizing SP has not yet been well validated. We aimed to clarify S‐ ICD eligibility before and after S‐ ICD implantation with and without SP . Methods Participants comprised 34 patients implanted with an S‐ ICD at Okayama University Hospital and its affiliated hospitals between February 2016 and August 2017. A total of 102 S‐ ICD vectors were assessed for eligibility before and after S‐ ICD implantation, at rest and during exercise testing. Vector availability was evaluated in the presence and absence of SP after S‐ ICD implantation. Results Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator eligibility was significantly better after implantation even without SP than S‐ ICD screening before S‐ ICD implantation, both at rest (before 65.7% vs after 95.1%, P < 0.01) and during exercise (before 59.3% vs after 90.6%, P < 0.01). SP improved S‐ ICD eligibility during exercise ( SP on 97.9% vs off 90.6%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis showed the prevalence of S‐ ICD eligibility increased significantly after S‐ ICD implantation compared to screening before implantation. SP further increased selectable vectors in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Available vectors increased significantly after S‐ ICD implantation compared to preoperative vectors as assessed by S‐ ICD screening ECG . T‐wave oversensing during exercise has been an unresolved issue for S‐ ICD , but SP will help prevent inappropriate operation with S‐ ICD .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tachibana et al. (2018) conducted an observational in S-ICD implantation (n=34). SMART pass algorithm vs. Without SMART pass was evaluated on S-ICD vector eligibility during exercise (p=0.03). The SMART pass algorithm significantly improved S-ICD vector eligibility during exercise compared to when the algorithm was off (97.9% vs 90.6%, P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: