Key result
Fentanyl maximizes satisfaction during SVT ablation without compromising arrhythmia inducibility.
Why the study?
Some anesthetic medications may adversely affect cardiac electrophysiology and conduction, potentially altering arrhythmia inducibility and negatively impacting catheter ablation outcomes in patients with SVT.
Does the choice of anesthetic agent affect cardiac electrophysiological parameters, arrhythmia inducibility, and satisfaction scores in adult patients undergoing EP study and catheter ablation for SVT?
RCT (n=30)
Computer-generated random number table with a block size of 15
No
Does the choice of anesthetic agent affect cardiac electrophysiological parameters, arrhythmia inducibility, and satisfaction scores in adult patients undergoing EP study and catheter ablation for SVT?
Fentanyl provides ideal conditions for conscious sedation during SVT ablation, offering high satisfaction scores and minimal disruption to electrophysiological parameters compared to other anesthetic agents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fentanyl preference for conscious sedation in SVT ablation; extends RCT evidence that inducibility is preserved across agents.
Objectives: Patients suffering from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) require diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in a cardiac electrophysiology (EP) laboratory. Some anesthetic medications may adversely affect cardiac EP and conduction, altering the ability to induce the arrhythmia, and may have a negative impact on the ablation treatment. This prospective, randomized, pilot study was conducted in the cardiac EP laboratory of a tertiary care hospital with the aim to identify the ideal anesthetic agent for cardiac EP study and catheter ablation of SVT. The primary objective was to compare the effects of anesthetic agents on cardiac electrophysiological parameters and arrhythmia inducibility. The secondary objective was to compare the patient, anesthesiologist, and cardiologist satisfaction scores with respect to the anesthetic agent used. Materials and Methods: Thirty adult patients with SVT for EP study and radiofrequency catheter ablation were administered either of the anesthetic agents: midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, or sevoflurane titrated to produce conscious sedation corresponding to bispectral index (BIS) values between 71 and 90. Electrophysiological parameters were recorded before and after administering the anesthetic agent. Results: Arrhythmia could be induced in all patients. Although electrophysiological parameters remained stable with ketamine administration; higher values of the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score and BIS were recorded. Propofol and sevoflurane administration was associated with deviation in electrophysiological parameters more than fentanyl and midazolam. The highest values of patient, anesthesiologist, and cardiologist satisfaction scores were obtained in the fentanyl group and the lowest in the ketamine group ( P < 0.002). Conclusion: In doses used to provide conscious sedation, fentanyl provided ideal conditions, and midazolam, propofol, sevoflurane, and ketamine provided satisfactory conditions for conducting EP study and catheter ablation for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The potential of propofol to impede cardiac conduction needs to be explored further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ameta et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) (n=30). Midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, or sevoflurane vs. Active comparators (each agent compared against the others) was evaluated on Cardiac electrophysiological parameters and arrhythmia inducibility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: