Key result
Age ≥60 and higher education linked to ~204% greater odds of good hypertension self-care.
Why the study?
Hypertension significantly contributes to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but this burden can be reduced by adherence to self-care practices, prompting the need to assess these practices, associated factors, and barriers.
What are the self-care practices, associated factors, and barriers among hypertensive patients in public hospitals in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia?
Cross-Sectional (n=415)
Yes
What are the self-care practices, associated factors, and barriers among hypertensive patients in public hospitals in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia?
Less than half of hypertensive patients in Bahir Dar city demonstrated good self-care practices, highlighting the need for comprehensive and tailored patient education and support.
Supports targeted education for younger, less-educated patients; leaves open whether addressing these factors improves self-care.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is defined as the sustained elevation of blood pressure to levels greater than 140/90 mmHg. It is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for 13% of total deaths and 7% of the global burden of disease. This condition can be significantly reduced by strictly adhering to various self-care practices for hypertension management, including compliance with prescribed antihypertensive medications, reducing salt intake, consuming a balanced diet, avoiding harmful alcohol use, engaging in regular physical exercise, and quitting tobacco smoking. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine self-care practices and associated factors, as well as to explore barriers to these practices among hypertensive patients in public hospitals in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An institution-based descriptive cross-sectional study, triangulated with qualitative research, was conducted from March 12 to April 12, 2021. A total of 415 participants were selected from three study settings. Data collected from a structured questionnaire were entered into EpiData v3.01 and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Both univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed. The statistical significance of associations between variables was determined using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values below 0.05. Eight purposively selected individuals participated in the qualitative component of the study. RESULTS: Good self-care practices for hypertension were observed in 44.8% of participants. Significant predictors of good hypertension self-care practices included age ≥ 60, education level of secondary school or higher, employment in government positions, controlled blood pressure, good knowledge about hypertension, strong social support, and a positive perceived health status, with Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of 3.04 (1.26, 7.33), 7.82 (2.79, 21.98), 1.53 (1.53, 14.90), 3.14 (1.70, 5.80), 2.27 (1.17, 4.41), 2.71 (1.31, 5.61), and 2.56 (1.35, 4.85), respectively. Major identified barriers included lack of emotional stability and stress, financial problems, lack of commitment, lack of attention, and inadequate counseling from health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of the participants demonstrated good self-care practices for managing hypertension. Strategies, programs, and guidelines should be developed to help clients understand the importance of multi-dimensional well-being in relation to various aspects of hypertension self-care practices. Furthermore, all patients should receive comprehensive and tailored information on recommended self-care practices and be assessed for barriers to adherence to these practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hailu et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=415). Good self-care practices for hypertension were observed in 44.8% of patients, with significant predictors including age ≥ 60 (AOR 3.04; 95% CI 1.26-7.33) and higher education.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: