Key result
Intravenous administration of the selective stretch-activated channel blocker GsMtx4 did not significantly reduce the number of ventricular premature beats during coronary occlusion in swine compared to saline.
Why the study?
Does GsMtx4 reduce ventricular ectopy and arrhythmias following coronary occlusion in swine?
Does GsMtx4 reduce ventricular ectopy and arrhythmias following coronary occlusion in swine?
The selective stretch-activated channel blocker GsMtx4 does not suppress ventricular ectopic activity following acute coronary occlusion in a swine model, despite preventing stretch-induced ERP reductions in isolated rat hearts.
GsMtx4 fails to suppress ventricular ectopy in swine coronary occlusion; leaves open stretch-activated channel blockade as antiarrhythmic strategy in ischemia.
Mechanical factors may contribute to ischemic ventricular arrhythmias. GsMtx4 peptide, a selective stretch-activated channel blocker, inhibits stretch-induced atrial arrhythmias. We aimed to assess whether GsMtx4 protects against ventricular ectopy and arrhythmias following coronary occlusion in swine. First, the effects of 170-nM GsMtx4 on the changes in the effective refractory period (ERP) induced by left ventricular (LV) dilatation were assessed in 8 isolated rat hearts. Then, 44 anesthetized, open-chest pigs subjected to 50-min left anterior descending artery occlusion and 2-h reperfusion were blindly allocated to GsMtx4 (57 μg/kg iv. bolus and 3.8 μg/kg/min infusion, calculated to attain the above concentration in plasma) or saline, starting 5-min before occlusion and continuing until after reflow. In rat hearts, LV distension induced progressive reductions in ERP (35±2, 32±2, and 29±2 ms at 0, 20, and 40 mmHg of LV end-diastolic pressure, respectively, P<0.001) that were prevented by GsMTx4 (33±2, 33±2, and 32±2 ms, respectively, P=0.002 for the interaction with LV end-diastolic pressure). Pigs receiving GsMtx4 had similar number of ventricular premature beats during the ischemic period as control pigs (110±28 vs. 103±21, respectively, P=0.842). There were not significant differences among treated and untreated animals in the incidence of ventricular fibrillation (13.6 vs. 22.7%, respectively, P=0.696) or tachycardia (36.4 vs. 50.0%, P=0.361) or in the number of ventricular tachycardia episodes during the occlusion period (1.8±0.7 vs. 5.5±2.6, P=0.323). Thus, GsMtx4 administered under these conditions does not suppress ventricular ectopy following coronary occlusion in swine. Whether it might protect against malignant arrhythmias should be tested in studies powered for these outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barrabés et al. (2015) studied Ischemic ventricular arrhythmias (n=44). GsMtx4 vs. Saline was evaluated on Number of ventricular premature beats during the ischemic period (p=0.842). Intravenous administration of the selective stretch-activated channel blocker GsMtx4 did not significantly reduce the number of ventricular premature beats during coronary occlusion in swine compared to saline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: