Key result
Baseline AF in TEER for severe MR linked to ~103% higher death or HF hospitalization risk.
Why the study?
AF and MR are closely linked and may worsen each other, prompting investigation into the impact of baseline AF in patients with MR undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.
Does baseline atrial fibrillation increase the risk of death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with severe mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair?
Cohort (n=156)
Does baseline atrial fibrillation increase the risk of death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with severe mitral regurgitation undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair?
Effect estimate: adjusted HR 2.03 (95% CI 1.12-3.69)
p-value: p=0.02
In patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for severe mitral regurgitation, baseline atrial fibrillation is associated with impaired cardiac remodeling, higher MR recurrence, and a doubled risk of death or heart failure hospitalization.
Baseline AF marks higher-risk TEER patients; leaves open whether rhythm control improves outcomes.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) and mitral regurgitation (MR) are closely linked, and one may worsen the other. We investigated the impact of baseline AF in patients with MR undergoing transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair. Methods One‐hundred‐fifty‐six consecutive patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair for severe MR were studied. The primary end point was the composite outcome of death or HF hospitalization. Transthoracic echocardiograms were performed at baseline and follow‐up. Results Mean age was 80.8±8.8 years and 82 (52.6%) patients were female. MR cause was primary in 69 (44.2%) and secondary in 87 (55.8%) patients. AF or atrial flutter was present in 59 (37.8%) patients at baseline. Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair was successful (≤2+ MR) in 58 (98.3%) and 94 (96.9%) patients with and without AF respectively ( P =0.59). During median 12.5 months follow‐up, the primary end point occurred in 64 patients (2‐year Kaplan–Meier estimated rate 41.0%), including death in 16 patients (10.3%) and HF hospitalization in 57 patients (36.5%). Baseline AF remained a significant independent predictor of death or HF hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.12–3.69], P =0.02). Left ventricular end‐diastolic volume, left atrial volume, and right ventricular systolic pressure decreased during follow‐up among patients in sinus rhythm but not among those in AF. AF was associated with an increased risk of severe MR recurrence (18.6% versus 8.2%, P =0.05). Conclusions In patients with HF and severe MR treated with Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair, baseline AF was associated with impaired right and left heart remodeling, more frequent MR recurrence, and more than doubling of the 2‐year risk of death or HF hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannina et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Severe mitral regurgitation and symptomatic heart failure (n=156). Baseline atrial fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm (no atrial fibrillation) was evaluated on Composite outcome of death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12-3.69, p=0.02). Baseline atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing TEER for severe MR increased the risk of death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.12-3.69; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: