Key result
A novel algorithm for extracting heart rate from neck acoustic recordings achieved 94.34% accuracy, an RMS error of 3.96 bpm, and a correlation coefficient of 0.93 compared to a commercial device.
Why the study?
Does a novel algorithm accurately extract heart rate from acoustic recordings at the neck compared to a commercial device?
Does a novel algorithm accurately extract heart rate from acoustic recordings at the neck compared to a commercial device?
Effect estimate: RMS error 3.96 bpm, r=0.93
A novel algorithm can accurately extract heart rate from acoustic recordings at the neck, potentially enabling long-term wearable monitoring.
Accuracy in small cohort suggests wearable potential; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
Heart rate is an important physiological parameter to assess the cardiac condition of an individual and is traditionally determined by attaching multiple electrodes on the chest of a subject to record the electrical activity of the heart. The installation and handling complexities of such systems does not prove feasible for a user to undergo a long-term monitoring in the home settings. A small-sized, battery-operated wearable monitoring device is placed on the suprasternal notch at neck to record acoustic signals containing information about breathing and cardiac sounds. The heart sounds obtained are heavily corrupted by the respiratory cycles and other external artifacts. This paper presents a novel algorithm for reliably extracting the heart rate from such acoustic recordings, keeping in mind the constraints posed by the wearable technology. The methodology constructs the Hilbert energy envelope of the signal by calculating its instantaneous characteristics to segment and classify a cardiac cycle into S1 and S2 sounds using their timing characteristics. The algorithm is tested on a dataset consisting of 13 subjects with an approximate data length of 75 h and achieves an accuracy of 94.34%, an RMS error of 3.96 bpm and a correlation coefficient of 0.93 with reference to a commercial device in use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2018) studied Heart rate monitoring (n=13). Algorithm for heart rate extraction from acoustic recordings at the neck vs. Commercial device in use was evaluated on Accuracy of heart rate extraction (RMS error 3.96 bpm, r=0.93). A novel algorithm for extracting heart rate from neck acoustic recordings achieved 94.34% accuracy, an RMS error of 3.96 bpm, and a correlation coefficient of 0.93 compared to a commercial device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: