Key result
Multidisciplinary heart team evaluation yields ~89% recommendation adherence in high-risk valvular heart disease.
Why the study?
Limited outcomes data exist for high-risk and complex valvular heart disease patients referred for surgery who undergo multidisciplinary heart team evaluation.
What are the treatment recommendations, adherence rates, and mortality outcomes following multidisciplinary heart team evaluation in highest-risk or complex valvular heart disease patients?
Cohort (n=121)
No
What are the treatment recommendations, adherence rates, and mortality outcomes following multidisciplinary heart team evaluation in highest-risk or complex valvular heart disease patients?
Multidisciplinary heart team evaluation for high-risk valvular heart disease achieves high adherence to treatment recommendations and facilitates individualized strategies with distinct survival outcomes based on the chosen intervention.
Background: Multidisciplinary heart team (MHT) evaluation is a class I recommendation for coronary and structural heart disease, yet limited outcomes data exist for high-risk and complex valvular heart disease (VHD) patients referred for surgery. Methods: From June 2021 to August 2022, our institutional MHT-comprising cardiac surgeons, interventional cardiologists, heart failure specialists, advanced imaging specialists, intensivists, and palliative care specialists-evaluated the highest-risk or complex VHD patients. Patient demographics, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, initial treatment plans, final team recommendations, and outcomes, including adherence to recommendations, 30-day readmission, and mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years were analyzed. Results: Among 121 patients, the MHT recommended surgery for 67%, transcatheter intervention for 14%, a hybrid approach for 3%, and medical management (MM) for 17%. Overall adherence to MHT recommendations was 89%. Thirty-day mortality was 7/81 (9%) for surgical patients, 3/17 (18%) for transcatheter, 0/3 for hybrid, and 4/20 (20%) for MM. By 2 years, mortality rose to 17/81 (21%) for surgery, 9/17 (53%) for transcatheter, 1/3 (33%) for hybrid, and 11/20 (55%) for MM. Conclusion: MHT evaluation facilitates individualized treatment strategies by distinguishing patients who may benefit from intervention despite high procedural risk, while sparing those unlikely to benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pickering et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Highest-risk or complex valvular heart disease (n=121). Multidisciplinary heart team (MHT) evaluation was evaluated on Adherence to recommendations, 30-day readmission, and mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years. Multidisciplinary heart team evaluation of high-risk valvular heart disease patients yielded 89% adherence, with 2-year mortality of 21% for surgery and 55% for medical management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: