Key result
Mitral valve heart team guidance linked to 4.4% 30-day surgical mortality and zero catheter-related deaths.
Why the study?
Although a heart-team approach carries a class I recommendation for mitral valve disease, supportive data evaluating this decision-making strategy remains lacking.
Does evaluation by a dedicated mitral valve heart team improve outcomes in patients with mitral valve pathology?
Cohort (n=158)
No
Does evaluation by a dedicated mitral valve heart team improve outcomes in patients with mitral valve pathology?
Implementation of a multidisciplinary heart team for mitral valve disease facilitates patient selection for different treatment modalities with acceptable short-term outcomes.
Supports dedicated mitral valve heart teams for individualized selection; leaves open survival benefit versus general teams in comparative trials.
BACKGROUND: Although decision-making using the heart-team approach is apparently intuitive and has a class I recommendation in most recent guidelines, supportive data is still lacking. The current study aims to demonstrate the individualised clinical pathway for mitral valve disease patients and to evaluate the outcome of all patients referred to the dedicated mitral valve heart team. METHODS: All patients who were evaluated for mitral valve pathology with or without concomitant cardiac disease between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 were prospectively followed and included. Patients were evaluated, and a treatment strategy was determined by the dedicated mitral valve heart team. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included; 67 patients were treated surgically (isolated and concomitant surgery), 20 by transcatheter interventions and 71 conservatively. Surgically treated patients had a higher 30-day mortality rate (4.4%), which decreased when specified to a dedicated surgeon (1.7%) and in primary, elective cases (0%). This was also observed for major adverse events within 30 days. Residual mitral regurgitation >grade 2 was more frequent in the catheter-based intervention group (23.5%) compared to the surgical group (4.8%). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the implementation of a multidisciplinary heart team for mitral valve disease is a valuable approach for the selection of patients for different treatment modalities. Our research group will focus on a future comparative study using historical cohorts to prove the potential superiority of the dedicated multidisciplinary heart-team approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heuts et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease (n=158). Multidisciplinary mitral valve heart team evaluation was evaluated on 30-day mortality (surgical group). Evaluation by a dedicated multidisciplinary mitral valve heart team guided treatment allocation for 158 patients, with a 30-day mortality of 4.4% in surgically treated patients and 0% in those undergoing catheter-based interventions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: