Key result
Dedicated mitral valve heart team evaluation linked to ~29% lower mortality vs general heart teams.
Why the study?
Although the heart team approach is a class I recommendation in US and European guidelines, supporting evidence remains lacking.
Does evaluation by a dedicated mitral heart team improve overall survival compared to a general heart team in patients with mitral valve disease?
Cohort (n=1,145)
Does evaluation by a dedicated mitral heart team improve overall survival compared to a general heart team in patients with mitral valve disease?
A dedicated mitral heart team approach is associated with significantly improved survival in patients with mitral valve disease compared to a general heart team.
Dedicated mitral valve teams may improve survival; hypothesis-generating observational data requiring randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Although in both the US and European guidelines the 'heart team approach' is a class I recommendation, supporting evidence is still lacking. Therefore, we sought to provide comparative survival data of patients with mitral valve disease referred to the general and the dedicated heart team. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort, patients evaluated for mitral valve disease by a general heart team (2009-2014) and a dedicated mitral valve heart team (2014-2018) were included. Decision-making was recorded prospectively in heart team electronic forms. The end point was overall survival from decision of the heart team. RESULTS: In total, 1145 patients were included of whom 641 (56%) were discussed by dedicated heart team and 504 (44%) by general heart team. At 5 years, survival probability was 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.79] for the dedicated heart team group compared to 0.70 (95% CI 0.66-0.74, P = 0.040) for the general heart team. Relative risk of mortality adjusted for EuroSCORE II, treatment groups (surgical, transcatheter and non-intervention), mitral valve pathology (degenerative, functional, rheumatic and others) and 13 other baseline characteristics for patients in the dedicated heart team was 29% lower [hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95; P = 0.019] than for the general heart team. The adjusted relative risk of mortality was 61% lower for patients following the advice of the heart team (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62; P < 0.001) and 43% lower for patients following the advice of the general heart team (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87; P = 0.010) compared to those who did not follow the advice of the heart team. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cohort, patients treated for mitral valve disease based on a dedicated heart team decision have significantly higher survival independent of the allocated treatment, mitral valve pathology and baseline characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nia et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease (n=1,145). Dedicated mitral valve heart team vs. General heart team was evaluated on Overall survival from decision of the heart team (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, p=0.019). Evaluation by a dedicated mitral valve heart team was associated with a 29% lower adjusted risk of mortality compared to a general heart team (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54-0.95; P=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: