Key result
CRAMS trial evaluates whether 6-week CV rehab improves 6MWT distance after TIA or mild stroke.
Why the study?
Evidence for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation following transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke is limited, with no studies evaluating cost-effectiveness or implementation determinants.
Does a 6-week exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation program improve 6-minute walk test distance in adults with recent TIA or mild stroke compared to usual care?
RCT (n=140)
Assessor-blind
1:1
No
Does a 6-week exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation program improve 6-minute walk test distance in adults with recent TIA or mild stroke compared to usual care?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of a 6-week cardiovascular rehabilitation program for secondary prevention in patients with recent TIA or mild stroke.
Will inform adoption of short CR in TIA/mild stroke care; extends limited RCT evidence on post-event rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: Internationally, stroke and cardiac rehabilitation clinicians agree that current cardiac rehabilitation models are a suitable secondary prevention program for people following a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke. There is strong evidence for exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in people with heart disease, however, the evidence for cardiac rehabilitation post-TIA or stroke is limited. Here we will explore the effectiveness and implementation of an integrated (TIA, mild stroke, heart disease) traditional exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR) program for people with TIA or mild stroke over 6-months. METHODS: This type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid study will use a 2-arm single-centre assessor-blind randomised controlled trial design, recruiting 140 participants. Adults who have had a TIA or mild stroke in the last 12-months will be recruited by health professionals from hospital and primary healthcare services. Participants will be assessed and randomly allocated (1:1) to the 6-week CVR program or the usual care 6-month wait-list control group. Distance completed in the 6-min walk test will be the primary effectiveness outcome, with outcomes collected at baseline, 6-weeks (complete CVR) and 6-months in both groups. Other effectiveness outcome measures include unplanned cardiovascular disease-related emergency department and hospital admissions, daily minutes of accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Implementation outcomes will be assessed using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, including a cost-effectiveness analysis. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants and CVR program health professionals, investigating the acceptability, value, and impact of the CVR program. Qualitative analyses will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. DISCUSSION: Few studies have assessed the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation for people with TIA and mild stroke, and no studies appear to have investigated the cost-effectiveness or implementation determinants of such programs. If successful, the CVR program will improve health outcomes and quality of life of people who have had a TIA or mild stroke, guiding future research, policy, and clinical practice, reducing the risk of repeat heart attacks and strokes for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621001586808 , Registered 19 November 2021.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freene et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke (n=140). Cardiovascular Rehabilitation (CVR) program vs. Usual care (6-month wait-list control) was evaluated on Distance completed in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The CRAMS trial will evaluate whether a 6-week cardiovascular rehabilitation program improves 6-minute walk test distance compared to usual care in 140 patients with transient ischaemic attack or mild stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: