Key result
Integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation achieves ~44% reach among eligible patients with high session completion.
Why the study?
No process evaluations have investigated the implementation of integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation for people with TIA, mild stroke, and CHD.
What are the factors influencing the implementation success and outcomes of integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation for TIA, mild stroke, and CHD?
Observational (n=315)
Yes
What are the factors influencing the implementation success and outcomes of integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation for TIA, mild stroke, and CHD?
Integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation for TIA, mild stroke, and CHD can be delivered as intended, though greater program awareness and clear referral pathways are needed to improve reach and maintenance.
Moderate reach and resource-dependent fidelity constrain integrated CVR scale-up; leaves open optimal referral strategies before routine adoption.
AIMS: Despite evidence supporting the inclusion of people with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or mild stroke in cardiac rehabilitation, no process evaluations have investigated the implementation of integrated [TIA, mild stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD)] cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR). We aimed to identify factors influencing CVR implementation success or failure, and evaluate CVR implementation outcomes, considering reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance, from clinician perspectives. METHODS AND RESULTS: This mixed-methods process evaluation was guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Quantitative patient process-level data were collected throughout CVR implementation. Qualitative data (semi-structured interviews, field notes, observations) were collected and deductively coded to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Quantitative and qualitative data were mapped to the RE-AIM dimensions. Reach was 44% (140/315) of the eligible patient population, with referral adoption highest at site 1 (74%), influenced by larger referral teams and greater programme awareness. Clinicians viewed CVR as effective based on international recommendations, but more evidence is needed. Cardiovascular rehabilitation was delivered as intended, with fidelity linked to adequate staffing and clinician confidence in delivery. Sixty-six per cent (46/70) of patients completed ≥5 of 6 CVR sessions. Clear referral pathways and access to resources are necessary for CVR maintenance. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular rehabilitation was delivered as intended, and clinicians reported people with TIA, mild stroke, and CHD demonstrate similar needs. However, greater programme awareness and aligning referral pathways with existing services are indicated. Access to CVR programme resources and clinicians' confidence in CVR delivery enabled implementation and are essential for maintenance. REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN 12621 00158 6808.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walton et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Transient ischaemic attack (TIA), mild stroke, and coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=315). Integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation (CVR) was evaluated on Reach of the eligible patient population. Implementation of integrated cardiovascular rehabilitation achieved a 44% reach among eligible patients, with 66% of participating patients completing at least 5 of 6 sessions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: