Key result
A modified phased-tracking method using pulse inversion accurately measured phantom elasticity at 297 kPa despite multiple-reflection noise, compared to 353 kPa with the conventional method.
Absolute Event Rate: 297% vs 353%
A modified phased-tracking method using pulse inversion improves the accuracy of arterial wall elasticity measurements by reducing the influence of multiple-reflection noise.
May reduce elasticity measurement errors from multiple reflections; leaves open in vivo validation for arterial applications.
In our studies on ultrasonic elasticity assessment, minute change in the thickness of the arterial wall was measured by the phased-tracking method. However, most images in carotid artery examinations contain multiple-reflection noise, making it difficult to evaluate arterial wall elasticity precisely. In the present study, a modified phased-tracking method using the pulse inversion method was examined to reduce the influence of the multiple-reflection noise. Moreover, aliasing in the harmonic components was corrected by the fundamental components. The conventional and proposed methods were applied to a pulsated tube phantom mimicking the arterial wall. For the conventional method, the elasticity was 298 kPa without multiple-reflection noise and 353 kPa with multiple-reflection noise on the posterior wall. That of the proposed method was 302 kPa without multiple-reflection noise and 297 kPa with multiple-reflection noise on the posterior wall. Therefore, the proposed method was very robust against multiple-reflection noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyachi et al. (2018) studied Arterial wall elasticity assessment. Modified phased-tracking method using pulse inversion vs. Conventional phased-tracking method was evaluated on Elasticity measurement with multiple-reflection noise (kPa). A modified phased-tracking method using pulse inversion accurately measured phantom elasticity at 297 kPa despite multiple-reflection noise, compared to 353 kPa with the conventional method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: