Key result
Higher leg fat index is linked to ~21% lower incident HF risk per SD.
Why the study?
The contribution of regional fat distribution evaluated using bioimpedance analysis toward heart failure risk in the general population without cardiovascular disease has rarely been studied.
Does regional fat distribution predict incident heart failure in the general population without cardiovascular disease?
Cohort
Does regional fat distribution predict incident heart failure in the general population without cardiovascular disease?
Effect estimate: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85)
Higher leg fat index, but not arm or trunk fat, is associated with a lower risk of incident heart failure in individuals without baseline cardiovascular disease.
Leg fat distribution may protect against incident heart failure; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with a high risk of heart failure. However, the contribution of regional fat distribution evaluated using bioimpedance analysis toward heart failure risk in the general population without cardiovascular disease has rarely been studied. METHODS: ). This study evaluated the association of regional fat mass (arm fat index [AFI], trunk fat index [TFI], and leg fat index [LFI]) with the risk of incident heart failure and whether regional fat mass adds a further prognostic value for heart failure besides body mass index (BMI) in a large prospective cohort study. RESULTS: During the median 12.1 years, 3134 incident heart failure cases occurred. After adjustment for BMI and other confounding factors, each 1-standard deviation increase in LFI was associated with a 21% lower heart failure risk even after adjusting for BMI and other confounding factors (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.85). However, we did not observe heart failure-associated risks with AFI and TFI (HR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09; HR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.91-1.04, respectively). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the protective role of LFI was more prominent in the elderly and female participants (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Regional fat measurement other than BMI can improve heart failure risk stratification; leg fat plays a protective role, yet arm and trunk fat do not, in the general population without cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xing et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in General populations without cardiovascular disease. Regional fat mass (leg, arm, and trunk fat indices) vs. Body mass index (BMI) was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85). Each 1-standard deviation increase in leg fat index was associated with a lower risk of incident heart failure (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.85), whereas arm and trunk fat showed no association.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: