Key result
A disease management program did not significantly increase mean survival compared to usual care (6.6 vs 6.2 years, P=0.656) over a 23.6-year follow-up in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Does a disease management program reduce all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure over very long-term follow-up?
RCT (n=412)
Open-label
2:1
No
Does a disease management program reduce all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure over very long-term follow-up?
A disease management program for heart failure did not reduce very long-term all-cause mortality but was associated with a lower proportion of heart failure-related deaths compared to usual care.
DMP shows limited mortality benefit in HF; confirms age >52 years and LVEF <45% as dominant prognostic factors.
Background Disease management programs (DMP) have reduced hospitalizations and improved quality of life in heart failure (HF). However, prognostic factors and survival in very long-term follow-up (> 20 years) have not been reported. Aims To evaluate the long-term effects of a disease management program (DMP) on heart failure outcomes and to identify prognostic predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HF followed for up to 23.6 years. Methods The REMADHE trial (NCT00505050, 2007-07-20) was a prospective, single-center, randomized trial ( n = 412) comparing DMP versus usual care (C) with initial follow-up of 2.47 years. This extended analysis followed patients for 23.6 years to identify prognostic predictors of all-cause mortality. Results The all-cause mortality rate was 88.3%. HF was the first cause of death followed by sudden death. Mortality was higher in the first 6-year follow-up. The predictive variables in multivariate analysis associated with mortality were age > 52 years ( P = 0.015), Chagas etiology ( P = 0.010), LVEF < 45% ( P = 0.008), digoxin use ( P = 0.002), NYHA IV ( P = 0.01), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) ( P = 0.03), and lymphopenia ( P = 0.005). In very long-term follow-up, DMP did not affect mortality in patients under guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). HF as a cause of death was more frequent in the C group (41.0% vs. 33.3% in the DMP group; P < 0.02). Conclusions DMP was not effective in reducing very long-term mortality; however, causes of death differed between groups, with more HF-related deaths in controls. Our findings that age, LVEF, Chagas’ disease, NYHA, renal function, lymphocytes, and digoxin use were associated with poor prognosis could influence future strategies to improve HF management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bocchi et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart Failure (n=412). Disease management program (DMP) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Mean survival (years) (p=0.656). A disease management program did not significantly increase mean survival compared to usual care (6.6 vs 6.2 years, P=0.656) over a 23.6-year follow-up in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: