Qualitative single-case study examines how university-industry collaboration enhances employability, suggesting impactful educational frameworks.
Purpose This article investigates the XJTLU-Academy model as an innovative case study to examine how a structured University-Industry Collaboration (UIC) mechanism cultivates learner agency and enhances graduate employability. Focusing on the “academies” at Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (XJTLU) as formal boundary-spanning units, the study contributes to reimagining the role of higher education in fostering sustainable career development. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative single-case study design is employed, centered on the embedded XJTLU-Academy model. To structure the analysis of institutional and pedagogical processes, this research employs an integrated conceptual framework (BESS), which synthesizes four theoretical lenses: Boundary-spanning, Experiential Learning, Social Cognitive Career Theory, and Sustainable Employability. Findings The study identifies five interconnected operating mechanisms within the academies: curriculum co-creation, project embedding, dual mentorship, ecosystem co-creation, and collaborative evaluation. These function synergistically as an integrated system rather than as discrete components. Within this industry-engaged, experiential learning environment, students demonstrated significant growth in professional agency, metacognitive and social-emotional competencies, and career clarity. Originality/value This paper illustrates how universities can strategically employ academy structures as boundary-spanning hubs to orchestrate a cohesive career-learning ecosystem. It contributes a novel, actionable framework (BESS) for analyzing and implementing teaching-focused UIC models that systematically bridge institutional collaboration, experiential pedagogy, and student agency development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: