Key result
Review synthesizes 37 evidence items guiding volume management in combined heart and kidney disease.
Why the study?
To summarise the best evidence on volume management for patients with coexisting cardiac and renal disorders.
What are the best evidence-based practices for volume management in patients with heart and kidney comorbidity?
Systematic Review
What are the best evidence-based practices for volume management in patients with heart and kidney comorbidity?
This rapid review summarizes 37 evidence items to guide volume management in patients with coexisting heart and kidney disease, emphasizing individualized strategies and multidisciplinary collaboration.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tailored volume management merits priority in cardiorenal patients; extends evidence synthesis for guideline refinement.
OBJECTIVE: To summarise the best evidence of volume management of patients with coexisting cardiac and renal disorders. DESIGN: An evidence summary, a form of rapid review. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in guideline websites, professional association websites and six databases included Web of Science, Embase, CIHAHL, PubMed, CNKI, SinoMed from their inception to 1 April 2024 on volume management for patients with heart and kidney comorbidity. We used the standard that the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing set based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) methods of generating an evidence summary, which includes problem establishment, literature retrieval, literature screening, literature evaluation, evidence summary and grading and the formation of practice suggestions. Two researchers independently carried out the screening, quality appraisal, classification and extraction of the included literature and evidence. RESULTS: This study selected 36 articles, including two systematic reviews, six randomised controlled trials, four quasi-experimental studies, six cohort studies, four cross-sectional studies, six expert consensus documents and eight guidelines. A total of 37 evidence items were summarised, covering assessment of volume management, strategies of volume management, education, selection of dialysis modality, patients' preferences and cooperation between multidisciplinary teams and patients. CONCLUSION: Cultural and regional differences should be considered in volume management of patients with heart and kidney comorbidity. Future research should focus on investigating the impact of various volume management strategies-including dialysis-related education for healthcare providers, dialysis modalities, initiation timing, dialysis dose, treatment duration, patient-reported outcomes and interdisciplinary collaboration-on volume-related indicators and symptoms of volume overload in patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Heart and kidney comorbidity. Volume management was evaluated on Evidence summary of volume management. Volume management in patients with heart and kidney comorbidity was summarized into 37 evidence items from 36 articles, covering assessment, strategies, education, and dialysis modality selection.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: