Why the study?
Do novel urinary and serum biomarkers improve the early detection and diagnostic accuracy of acute kidney injury compared to serum creatinine in patients undergoing urologic surgery?
Do novel urinary and serum biomarkers improve the early detection and diagnostic accuracy of acute kidney injury compared to serum creatinine in patients undergoing urologic surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Novel biomarkers show promise for earlier and more accurate detection of AKI in urologic surgery compared to serum creatinine, but require further validation for clinical implementation.
Patients undergoing urologic surgery are at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and consequently long-term deterioration in renal function. AKI is further associated with significantly higher odds of perioperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, higher mortality and costs. Therefore, better awareness and detection of AKI, as well as identification of AKI determinants in the urological surgery setting is warranted to pre-empt and mitigate further deterioration of renal function in patients at special risk. New consensus criteria provide precise definitions of diagnosis and description of the severity of AKI. However, they rely on serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be an inaccurate marker of early changes in renal function. Therefore, several new urinary and serum biomarkers promise to address the gap associated with the use of SCr. Novel biomarkers may complement SCr measurement or most likely improve the diagnostic accuracy of AKI when used in combinations. However, novel biomarkers have to prove their clinical applicability, accuracy, and cost effectiveness prior to implementation into clinical practice. Most preferably, novel biomarkers should help to positively improve a patient's long-term renal functional outcomes. The purpose of this review is to discuss currently available biomarkers and to review their clinical evidence within urologic surgery settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marianne Schmid (2015) conducted a review in Acute kidney injury in urologic surgery. Novel biomarkers (Cystatin C, NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABP, NAG) vs. Serum creatinine was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: