Key result
Compressed sensing cardiac MRI accurately assesses LV volume and mass vs conventional cine.
Why the study?
Compressed sensing cine may underestimate or overestimate LV volumes compared to segmented breath-hold techniques, and heterogeneous techniques across studies complicate individual comparisons.
Does compressed sensing cine cardiac magnetic resonance accurately measure left ventricular volumes and mass compared to conventional segmented cine in patients and volunteers?
Population
Patients and volunteers across 15 studies
Comparison
Compressed sensing cine vs conventional cine
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports faster LV assessment via shorter CMR acquisitions; confirms meta-analytic accuracy versus conventional cine.
Meta-Analysis (n=691)
Does compressed sensing cine cardiac magnetic resonance accurately measure left ventricular volumes and mass compared to conventional segmented cine in patients and volunteers?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 2.65 g (95% CI 0.57-4.73)
p-value: p=0.012
Compressed sensing cardiac magnetic resonance provides accurate left ventricular volume and mass assessments with significantly reduced scan and breath-hold times compared to conventional segmented cine.
Craft et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Left ventricular volume and function assessment (n=691). Compressed sensing (CS) cardiac cine MRI vs. Conventional segmented bSSFP cardiac cine MRI was evaluated on Left ventricular mass (LVM) difference (Mean difference 2.65 g, 95% CI 0.57-4.73, p=0.012). Compressed sensing cardiac MRI accurately assessed left ventricular volume and mass compared to conventional cine, with only small overestimations of LV mass and underestimations of stroke volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: