Key result
A systematic review of 70 studies found ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations had equivocal clinical outcomes, while DRI-based combinations reduced organ damage markers but lack long-term mortality data.
Why the study?
Does combination therapy with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or direct renin inhibitors improve clinical outcomes or surrogate markers compared to monotherapy in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or diabetic nephropathy?
Systematic Review
Does combination therapy with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or direct renin inhibitors improve clinical outcomes or surrogate markers compared to monotherapy in patients with hypertension, heart failure, or diabetic nephropathy?
While ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations offer equivocal clinical benefits and worse tolerability, direct renin inhibitor combinations show promise in reducing organ damage markers but lack long-term outcome data.
ACEI/ARB combinations warrant caution given equivocal outcomes; challenges dual blockade while leaving DRI surrogate benefits unproven for mortality.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have shown organ-protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); however, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rates, and decline in renal function remain high. In the ONTARGET trial in patients with hypertension at high cardiovascular risk, ACE inhibitor/ARB combination therapy provided no significant clinical outcome benefits over monotherapy, and was associated with a worse safety and tolerability profile. These results raise the question of whether ACE inhibitor/ARB, direct renin inhibitor (DRI)/ACE inhibitor and DRI/ARB combinations are of clinical value. SCOPE: Using PubMed and EMBASE databases, we conducted a systematic review of clinical trials published before June 2008 evaluating dual intervention with ACE inhibitors and ARBs, and compared these with trials of DRI/ACE inhibitor or DRI/ARB combinations. FINDINGS: A total of 70 studies met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. In patients with hypertension, ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations provided limited additional reductions in blood pressure (BP) over monotherapy. Outcomes benefits were unclear: VALIANT and ONTARGET demonstrated no enhanced outcome benefit of combination therapy over monotherapy; Val-HeFT and CHARM-Added showed reduced morbidity/mortality in patients with heart failure, but at the expense of poorer tolerability. Combination therapy with the DRI aliskiren and an ACE inhibitor or ARB provided significant additional BP reductions over monotherapy in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, and reduced surrogate markers of organ damage in patients with heart failure or diabetic nephropathy, with generally similar safety and tolerability to the component monotherapies. No morbidity and mortality data for DRI/ACE inhibitor or DRI/ARB combinations are currently available. CONCLUSIONS: ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations showed equivocal effects on clinical outcomes. DRI/ACE inhibitor and DRI/ARB combinations reduced markers of organ damage, but longer-term trials are required to establish whether more complete renin--angiotensin--aldosterone system control with aliskiren-based therapy translates into improved outcome benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Düsing et al. (2009) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension, heart failure, or diabetic nephropathy. Combination therapy (ACE inhibitor/ARB, DRI/ACE inhibitor, or DRI/ARB) vs. Monotherapy was evaluated. A systematic review of 70 studies found ACE inhibitor/ARB combinations had equivocal clinical outcomes, while DRI-based combinations reduced organ damage markers but lack long-term mortality data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: