Key result
Transvalvular ICD leads linked to worsening tricuspid regurgitation, while His-bundle pacing shows no adverse effect.
Why the study?
Limited data exist comparing the impact of different cardiac implantable electronic device lead types on the incidence and progression of tricuspid regurgitation.
Does the type of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead affect the severity and progression of tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=97)
No
Does the type of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead affect the severity and progression of tricuspid regurgitation?
p-value: p=0.035 for ICD, 0.099 for RV-PM, 0.68 for His-PM
Thicker, transvalvular CIED leads (such as ICDs) are associated with significant worsening of tricuspid regurgitation compared to thinner or non-transvalvular leads (such as His-bundle pacemakers).
May warrant caution with transvalvular ICD leads; leaves open whether His-bundle pacing reduces tricuspid regurgitation risk.
Background Placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) with leads that traverse the tricuspid valve is thought to contribute to tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, there are relatively limited data comparing the impact of different CIED lead types on the incidence and progression of TR. This study sought to quantify the change in TR severity following implantation of CIEDs with different lead types. Methods Patient data were collected on individuals with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), right ventricular‐paced pacemakers (RV‐PM), and His bundle‐paced pacemakers (His‐PM) placed by a single provider at a single institution between 2016 and 2019. Patients with extravascular CIED placement or with existing devices undergoing upgrade procedures were excluded. Severity of TR after CIED implantation was compared to baseline TR. Results A total of 97 patients receiving CIEDs were analyzed, including 63 with RV‐PMs, 23 with ICDs, and 11 with His‐PMs. Median patient age was 72 [interquartile range (IQR) 63–81] years, and 44% of patients were female. Echocardiograms were obtained a median of 20 [4–91] days before CIED implantation and 31 [17.9–43.0] months following implantation. Baseline TR grade was comparable between groups ( p = 0.65). TR severity significantly worsened after ICD implantation ( p = 0.035), RV‐PM implantation trended toward worsening TR severity ( p = 0.099), and no statistically significant difference was observed after His‐PM implantation ( p = 0.68). Conclusion The effect of CIED leads on TR represents a spectrum related to the type of lead traversing the tricuspid valve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices (n=97). Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) leads vs. Baseline (pre-implantation) was evaluated on Change in severity of tricuspid regurgitation before and after CIED implantation (p=0.035 for ICD, 0.099 for RV-PM, 0.68 for His-PM). Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators with bulky transvalvular leads significantly worsened tricuspid regurgitation severity (p=0.035), whereas His-bundle pacemakers had no significant effect (p=0.68).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: