Key result
Ethanol intake demonstrated a positive dose-response relationship with increased standard deviation of lateral position in both the driving simulator and on a real test track.
Why the study?
Does ethanol affect driving performance in a simulator consistently with real driving?
RCT (n=20)
Single-blind
Cross-over
Does ethanol affect driving performance in a simulator consistently with real driving?
SDLP in a driving simulator is a sensitive measure of ethanol-impaired driving, showing relative external validity compared to real driving.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Driving simulators reliably detect ethanol impairment; confirms SDLP external validity as a surrogate for real-world driving studies.
The purpose of this study was to establish and validate a driving simulator method for assessing drug effects on driving. To achieve this, we used ethanol as a positive control, and examined whether ethanol affects driving performance in the simulator, and whether these effects are consistent with performance during real driving on a test track, also under the influence of ethanol. Twenty healthy male volunteers underwent a total of six driving trials of 1h duration; three in an instrumented vehicle on a closed-circuit test track that closely resembled rural Norwegian road conditions, and three in the simulator with a driving scenario modelled after the test track. Test subjects were either sober or titrated to blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels of 0.5g/L and 0.9g/L. The study was conducted in a randomised, cross-over, single-blind fashion, using placebo drinks and placebo pills as confounders. The primary outcome measure was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; "weaving"). Eighteen test subjects completed all six driving trials, and complete data were acquired from 18 subjects in the simulator and 10 subjects on the test track, respectively. There was a positive dose-response relationship between higher ethanol concentrations and increases in SDLP in both the simulator and on the test track (p<0.001 for both). In the simulator, this dose-response was evident already after 15min of driving. SDLP values were higher and showed a larger inter-individual variability in the simulator than on the test track. Most subjects displayed a similar relationship between BAC and SDLP in the simulator and on the test track; however, a few subjects showed striking dissimilarities, with very high SDLP values in the simulator. This may reflect the lack of perceived danger in the simulator, causing reckless driving in a few test subjects. Overall, the results suggest that SDLP in the driving simulator is a sensitive measure of ethanol impaired driving. The comparison with real driving implies relative external validity of the simulator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helland et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=20). Ethanol vs. Sober (placebo drinks and pills) was evaluated on Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP; "weaving") (p=<0.001). Ethanol intake demonstrated a positive dose-response relationship with increased standard deviation of lateral position in both the driving simulator and on a real test track.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: