This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Previously reported results have demonstrated the efficacy of exposure and cognitive therapy in the treatment of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but have not shown one to be superior to the other. AIMS: To investigate whether treatment benefits and equivalence are maintained at 12-month follow-up in patients with chronic PTSD treated with either imaginal exposure or cognitive therapy. METHOD: Twelve-month follow-up of a randomised clinical trial. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects (87% of the sample) were available to follow-up. They did not significantly differ clinically from drop-outs. There was significant clinical improvement at 12 months compared with pre-treatment. However, 39% of those followed-up still met criteria for PTSD. There were no significant differences between the two treatments. Victims of crime displayed higher levels of symptoms at follow-up than victims of accidents. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical benefits for exposure or cognitive therapy were maintained.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarrier et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: