Key result
Cognitive-behavioral therapy using imaginal exposure was safe in patients with PTSD after cardiovascular events, with no significant differences in safety measures (systolic BP difference 0.5 mm Hg).
Why the study?
Is cognitive-behavioral therapy using imaginal exposure physically safe in patients with PTSD following a life-threatening cardiovascular event?
RCT (n=60)
Single-blind
randomly assigned
Is cognitive-behavioral therapy using imaginal exposure physically safe in patients with PTSD following a life-threatening cardiovascular event?
Mean Difference: 0.5 (95% CI -6.1–7.1)
Cognitive-behavioral therapy incorporating imaginal exposure is physically safe and shows promise for treating PTSD in patients traumatized by a life-threatening cardiovascular event.
No safety signals emerged with imaginal exposure in post-cardiac PTSD; leaves open efficacy confirmation in larger trials before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the physical safety of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) utilizing imaginal exposure in patients who suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following a life-threatening cardiovascular event. METHOD: In this phase I, prospective, single-blind trial conducted from April 2006 through April 2008, we randomly assigned 60 patients to receive either 3 to 5 sessions of imaginal exposure therapy (experimental group) or 1 to 3 educational sessions only (control group). Criteria for PTSD and other mental health disorders were evaluated according to DSM-IV using the full Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Safety assessments included patients' blood pressure and pulse before and after each study session and the occurrence of deaths, hospitalizations, repeat myocardial infarctions, or invasive procedures. We also investigated the effects of the treatment on PTSD symptoms (Impact of Event Scale and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale), depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the experimental and control groups and between exposure and nonexposure sessions in any of the safety measures. In addition, confidence intervals were such that the nonsignificant effects of exposure therapy were not of clinical concern. For example, the mean difference in systolic pressure between control and exposure sessions was 0.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -6.1 to 7.1 mm Hg). Nonsignificant improvements were found on all psychiatric measures in the experimental group, with a significant improvement in CGI-S in the entire cohort (mean score difference, -0.6; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.1; P = .02) and a significant improvement in PTSD symptoms in a subgroup of patients with acute unscheduled cardiovascular events and high baseline PTSD symptoms (mean score difference, -1.2; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.3; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive-behavioral therapy that includes imaginal exposure is safe and promising for the treatment of posttraumatic stress in patients with cardiovascular illnesses who are traumatized by their illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00364910.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shemesh et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following a life-threatening cardiovascular event (n=60). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) utilizing imaginal exposure vs. 1 to 3 educational sessions only was evaluated on Physical safety (blood pressure and pulse before and after each session, deaths, hospitalizations, repeat myocardial infarctions, or invasive procedures) (MD 0.5 mm Hg, 95% CI -6.1 to 7.1). Cognitive-behavioral therapy using imaginal exposure was safe in patients with PTSD after cardiovascular events, with no significant differences in safety measures (systolic BP difference 0.5 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: