Key result
ADT linked to only a ~3% higher rate of comprehensive CV risk factor assessment.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in prostate cancer and androgen deprivation therapy may worsen cardiovascular risk, but adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management was unknown.
Does androgen deprivation therapy initiation or history of ASCVD affect the rates of cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in US veterans with prostate cancer?
Cross-Sectional (n=90,494)
Yes
Does androgen deprivation therapy initiation or history of ASCVD affect the rates of cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in US veterans with prostate cancer?
Effect estimate: Risk Difference 3.0% (95% CI 2.1%-3.9%)
Absolute Event Rate: 68.8% vs 65.8%
Veterans with prostate cancer have high rates of underassessed and undertreated cardiovascular risk factors, and the initiation of ADT does not prompt clinically meaningful improvements in risk mitigation.
ADT initiation was associated with only minimal increase in CV risk factor assessment; leaves open whether targeted interventions can reduce undertreatment in prostate cancer.
Importance: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with prostate cancer, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may worsen cardiovascular risk. Adherence to guideline-recommended assessment and management of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in patients initiating ADT is unknown. Objective: To describe CVRF assessment and management in men with prostate cancer initiating ADT and overall. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of 90 494 men treated within the US Veterans Health Administration diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, was conducted. Participants included men with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and treatment with ADT within 1 year of diagnosis. Data analysis was conducted from September 10, 2019, to July 1, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of comprehensive CVRF assessment, uncontrolled CVRFs, and untreated CVRFs. Comprehensive CVRF assessment was defined as recorded measures for blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose levels; CVRF control as blood pressure lower than 140/90 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 130 mg/dL, and hemoglobin A1c less than 7%; and CVRF treatment as receipt of cardiac risk-reducing medications. Multivariable risk difference regression assessed the association between ASCVD and initiation of ADT and these outcomes. Results: Of 90 494 veterans, median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 62-70 years); and 22 700 men (25.1%) received ADT. Overall, 68.1% (95% CI, 67.8%-68.3%) of the men received comprehensive CVRF assessment; 54.1% (95% CI. 53.7%-54.4%) of those assessed had uncontrolled CVRFs, and 29.6% (95% CI, 29.2%-30.0%) of those with uncontrolled CVRFs were not receiving corresponding cardiac risk-reducing medication. Compared with the reference group of patients without ASCVD not receiving ADT, patients with ASCVD not receiving ADT had a 10.4% (95% CI, 9.5%-11.3%) higher probability of comprehensive CVRF assessment, 4.0% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.1%) lower risk of uncontrolled CVRFs, and 22.2% (95% CI, 21.1%-23.3%) lower risk of untreated CVRFs. Similar differences were observed in patients with ASCVD receiving ADT. In contrast, patients without ASCVD receiving ADT had only a 3.0% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.9%) higher probability of comprehensive CVRF assessment, 2.6% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.5%) higher risk of uncontrolled CVRFs, and 5.4% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.6%) lower risk of untreated CVRFs. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that veterans with prostate cancer had a high rate of underassessed and undertreated CVRFs, and ADT initiation was not associated with substantial improvements in CVRF assessment or management. These findings highlight gaps in care and the need for interventions to improve CVRF mitigation in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Prostate cancer (n=90,494). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs. No androgen deprivation therapy was evaluated on Comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) assessment (Risk Difference 3.0%, 95% CI 2.1%-3.9%). Among US veterans with prostate cancer and no prior cardiovascular disease, initiation of androgen deprivation therapy was associated with only a 3.0% higher probability of comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor assessment compared to no ADT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: