Key result
Moderate-intensity exercise acutely increased flow-mediated dilation by 1.21% (P<0.001), whereas higher-intensity exercise decreased it by 0.93% (P<0.001) in both AAA patients and healthy adults.
Why the study?
Does acute moderate- or higher-intensity exercise affect endothelial function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm compared to healthy adults?
RCT (n=44)
Randomized crossover
Does acute moderate- or higher-intensity exercise affect endothelial function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm compared to healthy adults?
Effect estimate: +1.21% (moderate) / -0.93% (high) (95% CI 0.69-1.73 / 0.41-1.44)
p-value: p=<0.001
Acute moderate-intensity exercise transiently improves endothelial function in AAA patients, whereas higher-intensity exercise transiently impairs it, with responses similar to those of healthy adults.
Acute moderate exercise transiently enhances endothelial function in AAA; confirms preserved intensity-dependent vascular responses versus healthy adults.
Endothelial dysfunction is observed in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), who have increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. This study aimed to assess the acute effects of moderate- and higher-intensity exercise on endothelial function, as assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), in AAA patients (74 ± 6 yr old, n = 22) and healthy adults (72 ± 5 yr old, n = 22). Participants undertook three randomized visits, including moderate-intensity continuous exercise [40% peak power output (PPO)], higher-intensity interval exercise (70% PPO), and a no-exercise control. Brachial artery FMD was assessed at baseline and at 10 and 60 min after each condition. Baseline FMD was lower [by 1.10% (95% confidence interval: 0.72-.81), P = 0.044] in AAA patients than in healthy adults. There were no group differences in FMD responses after each condition ( P = 0.397). FMD did not change after no-exercise control but increased by 1.21% (95% confidence interval: 0.69-1.73, P < 0.001) 10 min after moderate-intensity continuous exercise in both groups and returned to baseline after 60 min. Conversely, FMD decreased by 0.93% (95% confidence interval: 0.41-1.44, P < 0.001) 10 min after higher-intensity interval exercise in both groups and remained decreased after 60 min. We found that the acute response of endothelial function to exercise is intensity-dependent and similar between AAA patients and healthy adults. Our findings provide evidence that regular exercise may improve vascular function in AAA patients, as it does in healthy adults. Improved FMD after moderate-intensity exercise may provide short-term benefit. Whether the decrease in FMD after higher-intensity exercise represents an additional risk and/or a greater stimulus for vascular adaptation remains to be elucidated. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Abdominal aortic aneurysm patients have vascular dysfunction. We observed a short-term increase in vascular function after moderate-intensity exercise. Conversely, higher-intensity exercise induced a prolonged reduction in vascular function, which may be associated with both short-term increases in cardiovascular risk and signaling for longer-term vascular adaptation in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bailey et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=44). Moderate-intensity continuous exercise and higher-intensity interval exercise vs. No-exercise control was evaluated on Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at 10 and 60 min (+1.21% (moderate) / -0.93% (high), 95% CI 0.69-1.73 / 0.41-1.44, p=<0.001). Moderate-intensity exercise acutely increased flow-mediated dilation by 1.21% (P<0.001), whereas higher-intensity exercise decreased it by 0.93% (P<0.001) in both AAA patients and healthy adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: