Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compared cotinine, carboxyhemoglobin, and thiocyanate concentrations in blood sampled from 187 cigarette smokers and 181 non-smokers. All three differed significantly between smokers and non-smokers. Cotinine performed best as a test for assessing smoking status, with a sensitivity of 98% as compared with 94% for carboxyhemoglobin and 80% for thiocyanate, all at a specificity of 95%. These differences were statistically significant. Results by none of these three methods correlated well with number of cigarettes smoked per day.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pojer et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: