Key result
The Ross procedure provides superior long-term survival compared with conventional prosthetic aortic valve replacement in appropriately selected young and middle-aged adults.
Why the study?
Does the Ross procedure improve long-term survival compared to conventional prosthetic AVR in young and middle-aged adults undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Does the Ross procedure improve long-term survival compared to conventional prosthetic AVR in young and middle-aged adults undergoing aortic valve replacement?
The Ross procedure provides superior long-term survival compared to conventional prosthetic AVR in appropriately selected young and middle-aged adults, suggesting a need to reexamine current practice guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Ross consideration in selected young adults; leaves open randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to review the contemporary evidence surrounding the use of the Ross procedure in young and middle-aged adults and to identify the subset patients who are most likely to derive a benefit from this operation. RECENT FINDINGS: In appropriately selected young and middle-aged adults undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), the Ross procedure is currently the only operation that can restore long-term survival that is equivalent to that of the age-matched healthy general population. The ideal patient for the Ross procedure is a young, otherwise healthy adult with aortic stenosis and a small or normal size aortic annulus. In addition, this operation is particularly valuable in women contemplating pregnancy and patients with high level of physical activity, as well as those who wish to avoid the burden of lifelong anticoagulation. When carried out in expert centers with adequate surgical volumes, the Ross procedure is associated with superior long-term outcomes compared with prosthetic AVR, with minimal cost in terms of early morbidity and mortality. SUMMARY: Despite the expanding body of evidence demonstrating its long-term superiority over conventional prosthetic AVR in appropriately selected patients, the Ross operation remains largely underused. This situation mandates careful reexamination of current practice guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazine et al. (2017) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis. Ross procedure vs. Prosthetic aortic valve replacement was evaluated. The Ross procedure provides superior long-term survival compared with conventional prosthetic aortic valve replacement in appropriately selected young and middle-aged adults.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: