Key result
CT-derived aortic valve calcification density identifies severe bicuspid AS with ~86% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Sex-specific CT-derived AVC and AVCd thresholds for severe AS were established mainly in Caucasians with tricuspid valves, leaving their accuracy unclear in BAV patients and by ethnicity.
Does CT-derived aortic valve calcium scoring accurately identify severe aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves across different ethnicities?
Observational (n=485)
Yes
Does CT-derived aortic valve calcium scoring accurately identify severe aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves across different ethnicities?
CT-derived aortic valve calcium scoring thresholds currently proposed in guidelines have good accuracy to confirm severe aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves, though optimal thresholds may be higher in Asian men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CT calcium thresholds for bicuspid aortic stenosis; extends prior data but leaves optimal ethnic cutoffs open.
Background: Sex-specific thresholds of computed tomography (CT)-derived aortic valve calcification (AVC) or AVC density (AVCd) to identify severe aortic stenosis (AS) have been established in populations that consisted mainly of Caucasians with a tricuspid aortic valve. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) of previously established thresholds to identify severe AS in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and according to ethnicity: Caucasian vs. Asian. Methods: We built a multicenter registry of echocardiographic and CT data collected in BAV patients with at least mild AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction from 7 different centers. Anatomic severity of AS obtained by CT-derived AVC and AVCd was compared to hemodynamic severity of AS obtained by echocardiography. Results: (Se/Spe = 86/80%) for AVCd. Conclusions: The optimal thresholds to identify hemodynamically severe AS in BAV patients are similar in Caucasians but appear to be higher in Asian men, compared with thresholds previously reported in tricuspid aortic valve patients. Nonetheless, the thresholds currently proposed in the guidelines have good accuracy and can be applied in BAV patients to confirm AS severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (n=485). Computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification (AVC) and AVC density (AVCd) vs. Echocardiography (hemodynamic severity) was evaluated on Accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of previously established thresholds to identify severe aortic stenosis (Sensitivity 86%, Specificity 80% for AVCd). Computed tomography-derived aortic valve calcification density thresholds showed good accuracy to identify severe aortic stenosis in patients with bicuspid aortic valves, though optimal thresholds were higher in Asian men.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: