This study investigates the nature of collaboration on wikis as opposed tothe nature of collaboration resulting in a paper composition. In order tounderstand this phenomenon students were placed in groups of four andasked to write two essays during the semester. On one essay students wereasked to produce a composition in the target language on a wiki. Onanother they were asked to produce a composition that would be given tothe teacher in hard copy. Specific research questions includeddetermining to what extent students prefer collaborating to produce a wikior paper composition. Additionally, we attempted to determine, accordingto students, what the advantages and disadvantages of collaborating on awiki composition versus a paper composition are and what effect theseadvantages and disadvantages might have on collaboration. Data wascollected from over one hundred university students through likert-scaletype questions, open-ended written questions as well as face to faceinterviews. Findings indicate that the collaborative process on the wikireflected true collaboration where students had a hand in each part of thecomposition. On the other hand, while completing the paper composition,students generally handed their assigned portion to a single student in thegroup who was designated the compiler and would rarely see or commenton the other group members’ work. The authors also provide a discussionof specific advantages and disadvantages of wiki and paper-basedcompositions and important implications for practitioners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martinsen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: