Key result
Remote ischemic conditioning fails to reduce myocardial injury in pediatric patients receiving anthracyclines.
Why the study?
Anthracycline cardiotoxicity is a concern in childhood cancer survivors, and remote ischemic conditioning may offer myocardial protection.
Does remote ischemic conditioning reduce myocardial injury in pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy?
RCT (n=68)
Single-blind
1:1 ratio, stratified with minimization
Does remote ischemic conditioning reduce myocardial injury in pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy?
Remote ischemic conditioning did not exhibit cardioprotective effects or reduce myocardial injury in childhood cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote ischemic conditioning confers no cardioprotection in pediatric anthracycline recipients; challenges prior suggestions of benefit and redirects research to alternatives.
Background: Anthracycline cardiotoxicity is a concern in survivors of childhood cancers. Recent evidence suggests that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) may offer myocardial protection. Objectives: This randomized sham-controlled single-blind study tested the hypothesis that RIC may reduce myocardial injury in pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy. Methods: We performed a phase 2 sham-controlled single-blind randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of RIC on myocardial injury in pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive RIC (3 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a blood pressure cuff placed over 1 limb to 15 mm Hg above systolic pressure) or sham intervention. The intervention was applied within 60 minutes before initiation of the first dose and before up to 4 cycles of anthracycline therapy. The primary outcome was the plasma high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) level. The secondary outcome measures included echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Results: 0.05). None of the patients developed heart failure or cardiac arrhythmias. Conclusions: RIC did not exhibit cardioprotective effects in childhood cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. (Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Childhood Cancer [RIPC]; NCT03166813).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheung et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Pediatric cancer receiving anthracycline chemotherapy (n=68). Remote ischemic conditioning vs. Sham intervention was evaluated on Plasma high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) level at 1 week after completion of anthracycline treatment (natural log-transformed) (p=0.36). Remote ischemic conditioning did not significantly reduce plasma hs-cTnT levels or exhibit cardioprotective effects compared to sham in pediatric cancer patients receiving anthracyclines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: