Why the study?
Does ICRF-187 prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children?
Does ICRF-187 prevent anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children?
ICRF-187 may prevent subclinical cardiac abnormalities and clinical cardiomyopathy in children receiving anthracycline chemotherapy.
ICRF-187 was associated with fewer echocardiographic abnormalities in children on anthracyclines; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of ICRF-187 as a protective agent against anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography before and after each cycle of anthracycline chemotherapy associated with ICRF-187 and compared with that of a second group receiving anthracycline chemotherapy without ICRF-187. The patients were a group of 15 consecutive children affected with various types of solid tumors who were treated with either doxorubicin-daunomycin or epirubicin (average doses 340 and 280 mg/m2, respectively), and treatment was associated with ICRF-187. A second group of 15 consecutive children affected with different malignancies were simultaneously treated with either doxorubicin-daunomycin or epirubicin (average doses 309 and 270 mg/m2, respectively), but without ICRF-187 association. None of the patients treated with anthracyclines and ICRF-187 association showed abnormalities on echocardiographic examination. In the second group of patients treated with anthracyclines but without ICRF-187 association, we observed a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction to < 55% and a decrease in the left ventricular fractional shortening to < 28% in two patients (13.3%). One of these (6.6%) showed a dilatative cardiomyopathy. Both groups of patients were treated with low doses of anthracyclines. Although this study was not randomized, in patients without ICRF-87 cardioprotection, there was a trend for a worse evolution with one case of clinical cardiomyopathy as well as subclinical cardiac abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiavetti et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: