Key result
Covalent levosimendan analog i9 increases cardiac myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity by stabilizing open cTnC.
Why the study?
Does a covalent levosimendan analog (i9) improve Ca2+ sensitivity in cardiac muscle?
Does a covalent levosimendan analog (i9) improve Ca2+ sensitivity in cardiac muscle?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.22% vs 6.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
The covalent levosimendan analog i9 enhances calcium sensitivity in cardiac muscle by stabilizing the open conformation of cardiac troponin C, providing mechanistic insights into calcium sensitizers.
May support covalent Ca2+ sensitizer development for HF; hypothesis-generating in animal models pending human translation.
One approach to improve contraction in the failing heart is the administration of calcium (Ca(2+)) sensitizers. Although it is known that levosimendan and other sensitizers bind to troponin C (cTnC), their in vivo mechanism is not fully understood. Based on levosimendan, we designed a covalent Ca(2+) sensitizer (i9) that targets C84 of cTnC and exchanged this complex into cardiac muscle. The NMR structure of the covalent complex showed that i9 binds deep in the hydrophobic pocket of cTnC. Despite slightly reducing troponin I affinity, i9 enhanced the Ca(2+) sensitivity of cardiac muscle. We conclude that i9 enhances Ca(2+) sensitivity by stabilizing the open conformation of cTnC. These findings provide new insights into the in vivo mechanism of Ca(2+) sensitization and demonstrate that directly targeting cTnC has significant potential in cardiovascular therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineda-Sanabria et al. (2016) studied Systolic heart failure (preclinical model). Covalent levosimendan analog (i9) vs. Native cTnC was evaluated on Ca2+-sensitivity of force development (pCa50) (p=<0.05). The covalent levosimendan analog i9 increased the Ca2+ sensitivity of contraction in cardiac muscle (pCa50 increased from 6.10 to 6.22, P<0.05) by stabilizing the open conformation of cTnC.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: