PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1988CirculationOpen Access

Quantitative cineangiographic analysis of ventricular volume and mass in patients with single ventricle: relation to ventricular morphologies.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Are there differences in ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and ventricular mass between left ventricular type and right ventricular type single ventricles?

Population

28 patients with a single ventricle without atrioventricular valve regurgitation

Comparison

Biplane selective ventriculography vs Comparison between left ventricular type and…

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

TSTakeshi SanoMOMasanobu OgawaHYH Yabuuchi

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports comparable function by morphology; leaves open differences in mass or long-term outcomes.

Structured PICO

Are there differences in ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and ventricular mass between left ventricular type and right ventricular type single ventricles?

P
Population
28 patients with a single ventricle (12 left ventricular type, 16 right ventricular type) without atrioventricular valve regurgitation
I
Intervention
Biplane selective ventriculography
C
Comparator
Comparison between left ventricular (LV) type and right ventricular (RV) type single ventricle
O
Outcome
Ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and ventricular masssurrogate

There are no significant differences in ventricular volume or ejection fraction between left and right ventricular types of single ventricle when evaluated by biplane selective ventriculography.

Cite This Study

Sano et al. (1988) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a189b3d0048a5c8b24aaa61https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.77.1.62
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share