Key result
Right hand movements produce more lateral contralateral sensorimotor activation while shoulder movements produce medial activation.
Why the study?
Characterizing cortical activation patterns during movements in healthy adults may help clarify brain function after injury, such as in stroke.
Can functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) distinguish cortical activation patterns between hand and shoulder movements in healthy adults?
Population
20 healthy, right-handed participants
Comparison
Right-hand opening-closing vs right shoulder abduction-adduction motor tasks
Design
Block paradigm functional near-infrared spectroscopy study
Authors
Loading...
fNIRS differentiates proximal-distal upper limb motor maps; leaves open its role in monitoring post-injury recovery.
Observational (n=20)
Randomized task order
No
Can functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) distinguish cortical activation patterns between hand and shoulder movements in healthy adults?
fNIRS can successfully distinguish distinct cortical activation patterns between proximal (shoulder) and distal (hand) upper limb movements, highlighting its potential utility for monitoring motor recovery after brain injury.
Bonnal et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=20). Right hand movement task (opening-closing) vs. Right shoulder movement task (abduction-adduction) was evaluated on Changes in cortical oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxyhemoglobin (HbR) concentrations. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy showed that right hand movements produced more lateral contralateral sensorimotor activation, while shoulder movements produced more medial activation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: