Key result
Perioperative User Participation questionnaire demonstrates good face and content validity with high internal consistency.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to validate a Perioperative User Participation questionnaire (POUP) measuring elective adult surgical patient experiences and their evaluation of perioperative care items.
Cross-Sectional (n=68)
Yes
The POUP questionnaire demonstrates good face and content validity and internal consistency for assessing patient experiences in perioperative care, though further statistical validation is needed.
May support perioperative experience assessment; leaves open need for further psychometric validation before clinical use.
Aim To validate a Perioperative User Participation questionnaire (POUP) that measures elective adult surgical patient experiences and evaluation of the significance of selected perioperative care items. Materials and Methods A generic perioperative user involvement questionnaire (POUP) was developed in the form of four psychometric scales based on the Fundamentals of Care (FoC) framework. The POUP is designed to capture patients' perceived and subjective importance of selected items of perioperative care. It was developed in Danish and comprehensive Danish–Norwegian translations were conducted. Face and content validation were conducted involving patients and expert nurses. The relevance of items was assessed by 68 patients, and the internal consistency of the scales was calculated. Results Danish and Norwegian patients assessed the POUP's face validity, and perioperative expert nurses reported no problems in clarity or ambiguity. However, a few reformulations of the questionnaire texts were suggested. None of the questions were reported as irrelevant or difficult to answer nor was any topic reported missing. Patients assessed all items as relevant, and the internal consistency for the three scales was between 0.8 and 0.9, and no differences between countries were found. Conclusion The POUP questionnaire has four scales; the items are valid, but the scales need further statistical validation and refinement. At present, the POUP might provide insight into how elective adult surgical patients value the significance of perioperative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kymre et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Elective adult surgical patients (n=68). Perioperative User Participation (POUP) questionnaire was evaluated on Face and content validity, and internal consistency. The Perioperative User Participation (POUP) questionnaire demonstrated good face and content validity, with internal consistency for its three scales ranging between 0.8 and 0.9.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: