Why the study?
Detailed multidimensional assessment of PFO size with TOE may help determine PFO pathogenicity in cryptogenic stroke patients, prompting exploration of the additive value of Live xPlane and 3D TOE sizing.
Does Live xPlane and 3D Zoom TOE provide additive value over 2D TOE for anatomical PFO sizing in patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure?
Observational (n=45)
Does Live xPlane and 3D Zoom TOE provide additive value over 2D TOE for anatomical PFO sizing in patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Live xPlane and 3D Zoom TOE allow for more accurate peri-procedural measurement of the PFO base, which is significantly larger than 2D estimates and correlates with shunt size.
BACKGROUND: Detailed multidimensional assessment of patent foramen ovale (PFO) size with transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) may help to determine PFO pathogenicity in cryptogenic stroke patients. We explored the potential additive value of Live xPlane and three-dimensional (3D) TOE anatomical PFO sizing techniques. METHODS: Imaging data of 45 patients who underwent a 3D TOE-assisted percutaneous PFO closure were studied. The two-dimensional (2D) PFO separation distance and right-to-left (RL) contrast shunt magnitude were assessed on preprocedural TOE recordings. Peri-procedural measurements of the triangular anatomical PFO opening (base, height, and area) were performed after positioning of a stiff guidewire (SW) through the PFO, using Live xPlane imaging and 3D Zoom mode. RESULTS: The PFO SW base appeared on average 5 times larger than the preprocedural 2D PFO separation (median difference [IQR] = 13[5] mm; P < .001). For a same PFO separation, the width of the PFO base may vary significantly. The PFO SW base was significantly larger in patients with a large versus a small-to-moderate PFO RL contrast shunt (18 vs 15 mm; P = .007) and in those with a spontaneous versus a provoked shunt (18 vs 14 mm; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Live xPlane and 3D Zoom TOE allow peri-procedural measurement of the largest dimension of a PFO, which is the PFO base. Patients with a large or spontaneous RL contrast shunt appear to have a larger PFO base. The anatomical PFO base dimension may be taken into account for optimization of device and patient selection strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demulier et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Patent foramen ovale (n=45). Live xPlane and 3D Zoom TOE vs. 2D TOE was evaluated on Difference between PFO SW base and preprocedural 2D PFO separation (p=<.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: