Key result
Outpatient loop diuretic dose reduction is linked to ~35% lower mortality in chronic HF.
Why the study?
The relationship between patterns of outpatient oral loop diuretic dose reduction and prognosis in patients with HF remains unclear.
Does outpatient loop diuretic dose reduction improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Observational (n=679)
No
Does outpatient loop diuretic dose reduction improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.44–0.96)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.7% vs 29.4%
p-value: p=0.03
Outpatient loop diuretic dose reduction is associated with improved prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure, suggesting that successful down-titration indicates a favorable clinical trajectory.
Supports hypothesis that successful down-titration signals favorable trajectory in chronic HF; leaves open causality pending randomized trials.
Background: The relationship between patterns of outpatient oral loop diuretic (LD) dose reduction and prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated 679 patients with HF-prescribed LDs at baseline between September 2015 and August 2019. Dose reduction was defined as a change to a lower LD dose than the previous outpatient dose. Dose intensification was defined as a change to a higher LD dose than the previous outpatient dose. Patients were classified into no-reduction (no LD dose reduction during follow-up) and reduction groups (categorized into successive-reduction [≥2 successive LD dose reductions without intervening LD dose intensification] and single-reduction [LD dose reduction without successive dose reduction] groups). The primary outcomes were all-cause death, HF hospitalization (HFH), and the composite of cardiovascular death (CVD) or HFH. Results: Within a median follow-up of 53.7 (range, 2.6-99.1) months, 156 deaths were recorded: 121 (29 %), 31 (15 %), and three (4 %) patients in the no-reduction (n = 411), single-reduction (n = 195), and successive-reduction (n = 73) groups, respectively. After adjusting for cofounders, the reduction group had a lower risk of primary outcomes than the no reduction group (all-cause death: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.44-0.96; CVD or HFH: HR=0.69, 95 %CI=0.52-0.93; HFH: HR=0.69, 95 % CI=0.52-0.93). The successive-reduction group had a lower risk of the composite of CVD or HFH (HR=0.26, 95 % CI: 0.10-0.67) and HFH (HR=0.34, 95 % CI=0.13-0.86) than the single-reduction group. Conclusions: Outpatient LD dose reduction patterns can be indicators of good prognosis in HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koike et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=679). Outpatient oral loop diuretic dose reduction vs. No loop diuretic dose reduction was evaluated on All-cause death (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.96, p=0.03). Outpatient loop diuretic dose reduction was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.65) compared to no dose reduction in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: