Key result
Substrate modification through circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is crucial for curing atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with long-lasting or permanent disease.
Why the study?
Does substrate modification combined with trigger elimination improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone?
Does substrate modification combined with trigger elimination improve outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to pulmonary vein isolation alone?
Substrate modification, in addition to trigger elimination, is essential for successful ablation of atrial fibrillation, especially in long-standing or permanent cases.
Substrate modification may aid persistent AF ablation; leaves open optimal strategies versus PVI alone pending RCTs.
From the time catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) was first reported, of the two dominant approaches for AF ablation, only pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has been modified, while circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) as performed by our group in Milan has remained substantially unmodified. In fact, PV isolation as initially performed by Haissaguerre et al. has undergone rapid evolution toward substrate modification with significantly higher success rates without major complications. Modification of such technique was due to modification of the substrate. It is now evident that substrate modification is indeed crucial for curing AF particularly in patients with long‐lasting or permanent AF. Indeed, to achieve good outcomes, any ablation technique should simultaneously include elimination of all triggers associated with modification of both anatomic and autonomic substrate, as we started to do many years ago by performing CPVA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pappone et al. (2006) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Substrate ablation was evaluated. Substrate modification through circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is crucial for curing atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with long-lasting or permanent disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: